"The Shocking Benefits of Limited Government Intervention: Uncover the Secret"
By Individualist Iguana
- 3 minutes read - 487 wordsThe concept of limited government intervention has become increasingly prominent in our current intellectual climate. While there has surely been a long history of exploration and critique of the idea of minimal governmental control, this article will attempt to uncover the secret of its shocking benefits.
To put things into perspective, it is essential to outline the core argument of why limited government intervention can be beneficial. At the base of its rationale lies the principle of liberty, whose meaning is twofold: it stands for both individual freedom and the notion of limited government. Drawing on classical theories such as those espoused by philosopher John Locke, the idea of liberty implies the freedom of citizens to pursue their interests and thrive within a system that prevents large-scale government interference. While it is correct to assume that small amounts of government intervention can be beneficial, it is well-known that an unrestrained use of power into any sector usually leads to an unjust redistribution of resources and an increase in overall bureaucracy.
Taking a deeper dive into history, it is easy to spot where such principles have been put into effect. From the Glorious Revolution of 1681 in the UK to the implementation of the Bill of Rights in the US, countless events have taken place to confirm the benefits of a limited government. As the Magna Carta of 1215 testifies, it may be the role of a sovereign ruler or the power of citizens to reign, but either way, the outcome should always be that of a deserving limitation in terms of the government’s control.
The philosophy of limited government control is not only beneficial in terms of justice, but according to classic liberal thinkers, it can also be used as an instrument to guarantee economic growth. The so-called Austrian School of Economics, popularized by Friedrich Hayek and Ludwig Von Mises, argues that free markets benefit more from minimal government intervention. It follows that such interference should, then, be restricted to overseeing the basic rules of trade and guarantee the safety of citizens, particularly those in vulnerable social and economic positions.
The current application of the idea of limited government intervention clearly displays its positive potential. In countries such as Switzerland, where the government maintains a minimal existence, citizens continue to enjoy some of the highest standards of living in the entire world, due both to an abundance of economic activities and an above average GDP per capita.
In essence, this article should have offered an enlightening exploration into the concept of limited government control and its upheld benefits. From a protection of individual freedom to an increased economic development, this article should have offered possible examples to substantiate the academic argument of the merits of maintaining a reduced presence from a government body. Now that the secret is out, let us all move forward and put into action what the concept of limited government has to offer.